It's a funny thing, life. At any one moment everything can change
and your outlook is altered and new horizons open up as old vistas fade into
the distance. On day 14 of being a doctoral candidate I feel this process as it
is happening and a new reality hoves into view; the life of the palaeontologist
and already it's quite obvious my routine outside of my day job is changing
rapidly. After detailed discussions with both of my supervisors I am now
constructing a framework for my research, and considering some of the
practicalities of the process of actually doing a PhD.
First amongst these is the literature review. I have already been
collecting the relevant literature around my key research subject, the
nodosaurid Polacanthus foxii. Recent years have shown an increased
amount of interest around Early Cretaceous ankylosaurs and this work will
provide the structure in which my own research will sit. There's lots to do,
and plenty of specimens to see in the UK alone so I'm looking forward to
getting into the various collections to examine their fossils. I'm also hoping
to look at all Early Cretaceous thyreophorans to compare material, and there
are constant rumours of finds by collectors that might warrant further
investigation.
Of course planning a literature review is a project in itself and
there is plenty to consider when setting out on such a large undertaking. Aside
from the process of selecting, reading and annotating the core literature there
are also the practical matters of organising and structuring this library, with
directory structures, naming conventions and the effective and efficient filing
of notes and references to deal with. Here I can fall back on my own commercial
experience as a motion graphics artist and animator as many of the projects I
work on have large amounts of assets in the form of scripts, visual and written
reference material as well as often very large amounts of data (sometimes 100s
of gigabytes) and files generated during the production of a complex animation,
and I have developed a system and directory structure that I can adapt for my
research.
Then there is the subject of annotating the papers themselves.
Should I pile them all on my iPad and use an app such as iAnnotate? Should I
write in a book or use and index card system and type up onto the computer?
Which is the best for data integrity and security? If the electricity goes off,
could I still work? How do I keep my bibliography up to date and accurate?
There's plenty to be going at, and there's not a moment to loose
in implementing a system so I'd better crack on. I'm sure any procedure I put
in place for conducting my literature view might change over time, so I want to
keep it as flexible as possible without sacrificing efficiency and most
importantly, a method of keeping accurate notes and refs making papers quick and easy to
locate.
So off we go . . .
